finished the da vinci code
personal, religion December 25th, 2003i started and finished the da vinci code this past week. i was surprised at how detailed and well put together the novel was. the author put together a story that tells a detailed controversial history of the bible, the catholic church, and the secret societies that encircle them both. you’ll notice that is did say novel, not a history book. this book comes in the form of a enthralling dramatic well researched murder mystery that not only sparked my interest in the alternate history of the church but really made me think about how much the church is like today’s corporate america.
both the church and corporate america do everything within their power to change peoples perception of their indiscretions, including rewriting history. they amass huge marketing campaigns to deface their enemies or advertise their few successes. they beg borrow and steal to stay alive and then later deny any involvement or indiscretions that led to their failures.
anyhow, throughout the book during different plot points the main character referred to various books and research from which he extracted his knowledge. my interest in the topics that were discussed was piqued throughout the book so i decided to follow my interest and pick up a few of the books. i started reading holy blood, holy grail which actually came out in the early 80’s and made quite a splash around the release. i also plan on reading a few of the other books he recommends like the woman with the alabaster jar, the messianic legacy, the templarr revelation, and others.
i created a new ”religion” category that i’ll be posting things i learn or find interesting from the books. yet another new hobby for me … woohooo.
December 27th, 2003 at 2:12 pm
I loved the book as well!
December 31st, 2003 at 9:57 am
Sean…What’s up. I came by your site and was interested in your portaball…and then saw this post about the da vinci code.
I’m finding that literature (and I frown upon calling the da vinci code literature) is powerful stuff. It can actually lead to a blurring of the lines between fact and fiction…
While I fall into the category of people who attend a church, I know it has flaws. Also I am not Catholic and don’t believe that the Catholic church represents me very well. Catholics make up what percentage of church folks? Protestant, Orthodox?
Anyway…I find it interesting that all of the books you mention are not mainstream positions. Nothing like blowing a fringe position out of proportion to backup one’s presuppositions and prejudices.
I’m all for discussing and seriously critiquing the church or anything else, but how about more credability?
Why not start with Karen Armstrong’s A History of God or Crossan’s The Hstorical Jesus? Should be able to find a better alternative history of the church.
Oh, btw, since all history is written by humans (however to be honest I haven’t verfifed this), all history is narrative.
Later dude.
December 31st, 2003 at 10:22 am
Sean…what kind of blog is this anyway? I can’t create an original post? I have to wait for you to pick the agenda? What is this…your blog or something?
Alright so I was curious to know if the quote at the top of the page was yours…the one that says wisdom is knowing what path to take next … integrity is taking it?
Shouldn’t it say something like wisdom is knowing what path to take next … faith is taking it?
or even faith is knowing what path to take next … integrity is taking it?
December 31st, 2003 at 1:32 pm
first off … yes, this is my weblog where i post things that i find interesting and want to post about. this isn’t a wiki where people can edit and post about anything. i control the flow of conversation since it is my domain. as for the book links that you posted, i will definitely check them out. the point of the post though was really that i don’t believe nor do i trust the “mainstream” church. throughout history it has been shown that they have rewritten history to meet their own hidden agenda. given this and the less than ideal history they represent forgive me if i don’t jump to the “mainstream”. i think of myself as someone who tries to understand both sides of a conversation and given the churches less than ideal treatment of my family i’ve heard enough from their propaganda machine. they can’t even take a stance on an issue and lead their constituents. instead they would rather not take a position or better yet throw hundreds of years of doctrine out the window to make a few bucks or take the “pc” stance. instead of listening to their tainted historical view i’d prefer listen to other voices for a change.
December 31st, 2003 at 2:20 pm
thanks for the reply. I think I got the gist of your post. I guess I am saying that you seem to rail against the “mainstream” church and associate this within the context of a fringe group and fringe writings. You associated “mainstream” with fringe.
All I’m saying is that You don’t dig the “mainstream” church and these books don’t represent the “mainstream” church. Cool.
I’ve seen BS in the church as well, but somehow I don’t expect that it will be a perfect organization. It’s run by people. Maybe we have different views on theology. Most of the crowd I seem to be associated with get railed for not being “pc”. They seem to stick to their guns too much. I try to distance myself.
On another topic. History == narrative whether it’s the church, Stephen Jay Gould, Edmund Morris or Plutarch.